71. FMVSS No. The vehicles with seat belt warning systems were Volvos and certain Cadillac and Chevrolet models. Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by mail. One of the two collisions that happen in a crash is: The increase of speed is a squared relationship. :Z_. Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. All of those manufacturers' rear seat belt warning systems use a display that is visible to the driver and indicates which rear seat belts are in use, as well as employing a change-of-status reminder that has visual and audible components. [64] Most recently, in 2017, front seat belt use was 89.7 percent, while rear seat belt use was only 75.4 percent, a difference of 14.3 percent. WebThe Michigan No-Fault parked vehicle exception provides that only under very specific circumstances will a car accident victim be entitled to No-Fault PIP benefits after being 0000028596 00000 n Interaction with other vehicle warnings. This includes, among other things, a visual warning indicating any rear seating position in which a seat belt is unfastened. Motor vehicle safety standard means a minimum performance standard for motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. 26. should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official "|\JUe373 {Pa Because, unlike NOPUS, it is not observational, the MVOSS is not the best indicator of national belt use. Having an audible or longer-duration visual warning activate for an unoccupied seat (such as might be the case if the system did not have occupant detection) could be a nuisance for the driver and might either desensitize the occupants to the Start Printed Page 51084warning signal, or lead them to circumvent or defeat the system. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. 20. DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra, p. 8; Schroeder & Wilbur, supra, p. 33. %PDF-1.4 % Please see the Privacy Act discussion below. [79] To prevent unnecessary signals, the system must also be capable of detecting whether the front passenger seat is occupied. 0000042748 00000 n DOT HS 812 069. Regulatory History of Automatic Crash Protection in FMVSS 208. In addition to this, while enhanced warnings are potentially more effective due to their persistence and annoyance,[68] 04/28/2023, 244 Effectiveness and Acceptance of Enhanced Seat Belt Reminder Systems: Characteristics of Optimal Reminder Systems, Final Report. In this Issue, Documents Obstruction of vehicle windows. Traffic School Module Quizzes Flashcards | Quizlet If a visual warning system including a telltale were to be required, should NHTSA propose requirements for telltale characteristics, and if so, what should they be? insomnia. Where should the visual warning be located, especially with respect to the rear passenger, if such a telltale were appropriate? WebThe following vehicles can use the Express Lanes. A change in seat belt status in front and rear seats also initiates the second level warning. 0000028439 00000 n 16, Revision 9 8.4.4.2. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM). 76. Three are particularly relevant to today's ANPRM. [24] Unattended vehicles Definition | Law Insider 16 and is also required to obtain bonus points for a seat belt reminder system by Euro NCAP.[61]. Foldable or stowable seats in the second row are not as prominent in minivans. 22. Impressing passengers. NHTSA is considering proposing any of a variety of minimum requirements for a rear seat belt warning system. 04/28/2023, 258 Section 31503 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. These measurements come from FMVSS No. The President of the United States issues other types of documents, including but not limited to; memoranda, notices, determinations, letters, messages, and orders. NHTSA NHTSA especially seeks any data related to these issues. 2009. 30111,[43] True Modern vehicles are designed to crush when they crash to absorb DOT HS 811 206. If the electrical connection is not reestablished, the warning system could malfunction or provide inaccurate information. 4092 81 A seat belt warning system utilizing occupant detection technology could provide false reminders if the occupant detection were inaccurate. Brian L. Cox, Chicago Tribune, 7 June 2022 See More [49] documents in the last year, by the International Trade Commission __________ is a type of drug that temporarily stimulates some vital process or organ in the body. 208 to require a rear seat belt warning system. f. Hg2Cl2\mathrm{Hg}_2 \mathrm{Cl}_2Hg2Cl2 [58] PCMAG, 20 Nov. 2022 Across the state in 2021 the seat belt compliance rate was 93.5% but unbelted occupants still accounted for over half of those killed in traffic crashes, the release said. documents in the last year, 295 See infra, Part V. 46. 16, Revision 9 8.4.2.3.1; European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.3.1.1. What would be the increased cost associated with such a system (on a per seat and per vehicle basis), and how would it compare to the increased benefits (if any)? Even for seats where the connections are automatically established when the seat is reinstalled, the automatic connectors might malfunction and a proper connection may not be made. NHTSA also seeks comment on warning systems that utilize occupant detection. (2019, February). Webrestraints. The warning system in such vehicles might be required to automatically connect the electrical connections when the seat is put in place or, if a manual electrical connection is required, the connectors might be required to be readily accessible. In it, we seek comment on a variety of issues related to a requirement for a rear seat belt warning system, including potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. The agency also determined that the Safety Act did not prohibit manufacturers from implementing enhanced warning systems as long as the manufacturer provided some means of differentiating the voluntarily-provided signal from the required signal (for example, by a clearly distinguished lapse in time between the two signals). ][99] Among drivers of vehicles without a rear seat belt warning, attitudes towards rear belt warnings were generally positive as well: A majority (55%) indicated that it was important to them that their next vehicle be equipped with a rear belt warning system. Search for an answer or ask Weegy. documents in the last year, 83 [73] 16. In 2001, the House Committee on Appropriations directed NHTSA to contract with the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study on the benefits and acceptability of minimally intrusive vehicle technologies to increase seat belt use. Unbelted occupants are overrepresented in fatal crashes. For rear seat occupants, seat belts reduce the risk of fatality by 55 percent (for passenger cars) and 74 percent (for light trucks and vans). [ 1] 2017. First, it conducted the multi-phase seat belt Start Printed Page 51088warning study that was part of the research program initiated pursuant to SAFETEA-LU. (Because the negative-only and full-status systems would indicate the presence of an unbuckled belt, they would probably want to avoid giving this warning unless the seat were occupied; if not, such false positives could lead the driver the disregard the warning or circumvent the system.). were 208 requires the air bag system to be active during several static tests using a 5th percentile adult female dummy in the right front passenger seat. ------WebKitFormBoundaryYJfQNYRidn32dAGX Should it also depend on the recipient of the warning (for example, driver versus rear passenger)? MAP-21 requires the Secretary to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend FMVSS No. NHTSA also seeks comment on how the potential for false positives can be minimized (because false positives can lead occupants to ignore or circumvent the warnings, or lead to driver distraction). 0000003170 00000 n Under 49 U.S.C. Child Passenger Safety: Get the Facts | Transportation Safety | CDC In 1972, NHTSA adopted occupant protection options for passenger cars that included (for cars that did not provide automatic protection) an interlock system that would prevent the engine from starting if any of the front seat belts were not fastened. NHTSA seeks comment on the effectiveness of rear seat belt warning systems. Telephone: (202) 366-9826. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 directs NHTSA to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 requires a seat belt warning system for the driver's seat, but not other seating positions. publication in the future. 75 FR 37343 (June 29, 2010) (Docket No. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra, p. 1. Alternatives to a visual warning (telltale) on vehicle start-up could include an audible signal, either electronic or mechanical, or a haptic warning (e.g., steering wheel or seat vibration). Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives.
Owner Operator Sand Hauling Jobs,
Vitaminat Qe Te Shendoshin,
Central Catholic Tuition 2020,
Articles U